Skip to content

MediaUnited States5 min read

Jimmy Kimmel Live Preempted by Nexstar, Sinclair ABC Affiliates

Major station groups Nexstar and Sinclair are still preempting 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' on ABC affiliates, opting for local news. Discover why this move impacts nearly a quarter of U.S. households.

Share

Topics

Sinclair and Nexstar Join in Jimmy Kimmel Live Preemption, Replacing Late-Night With Local News Amid ABC Affiliate Controversy

Nexstar Media Group and Sinclair Broadcast Group are preempting ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! on many affiliated stations, expanding local newscasts and regional programming after controversial remarks by the host — affecting roughly a quarter of ABC households.

  • Station groups preempting: Nexstar and Sinclair are withholding the show and running expanded local news or regional programming instead.
  • Scope: The move removes the program from linear ABC affiliates in roughly one quarter of U.S. households that would otherwise receive it.
  • Network vs. local control: Disney/ABC has reinstated the host on its national schedule and streaming platforms, but local owners retain discretion over affiliation airings.

What happened

Following remarks by Jimmy Kimmel about a political commentator’s killing that ABC called “ill-timed and insensitive”, station owners Nexstar and Sinclair announced they will continue to preempt Jimmy Kimmel Live! on many ABC affiliates while talks continue about community standards and respectful dialogue (sources: IMDb News, Bleeding Cool, Barrett Media).

What Nexstar and Sinclair announced

Nexstar said it “made a decision last week to preempt Jimmy Kimmel Live! following what ABC referred to as Mr. Kimmel’s ‘ill-timed and insensitive’ comments… We stand by that decision pending assurance that all parties are committed to fostering an environment of respectful, constructive dialogue in the markets we serve.” Sinclair issued a similar statement and said local news and other relevant programming will fill the late-night slot while discussions with ABC continue (sources: IMDb News, Barrett Media).

Why station groups took this step

Both station groups framed the decision as one of local responsibility. Executives cited a need to foster “respectful, constructive dialogue” in the communities they serve and said local program control allows them to respond to audience sensitivities and market expectations (sources: IMDb News, Bleeding Cool).

Controversy background

The controversy began after Kimmel’s remarks connecting an assassin to the MAGA movement and satirizing reactions from former President Trump. ABC described the segment as

“ill-timed and insensitive at a critical time in our national discourse.”

ABC briefly suspended Kimmel before Disney/ABC decided to bring him back on air and to make episodes available on Disney-owned streaming services, which kept the show accessible nationally even as local stations moved to preempt.

How viewers are being served instead

In affected markets, the late-night hour is being used for expanded local newscasts, investigative segments, town-halls and regionally focused programming tailored to local audiences. Stations say these replacements will emphasize community issues and local context as an alternative to national late-night comedy (sources: Bleeding Cool, IMDb News).

Note: Disney-owned streaming platforms still carry the show for subscribers, meaning households without streaming access may lack linear access while preemptions remain in place.

Scope and who is affected

Nexstar and Sinclair own and operate enough ABC affiliates that the preemptions remove the program from linear broadcast for roughly one quarter of U.S. households that would typically receive the show through local ABC stations. The impact varies by market and will be most noticeable where those station groups control major ABC outlets (sources: That Park Place, IMDb News).

Disney and ABC response

Disney and ABC have reinstated Kimmel on the national schedule and made episodes available on Disney-owned streaming services, preserving national access for subscribers. However, network decisions do not compel locally owned affiliates to carry network programming if station owners refuse — highlighting a split between national programming strategy and local broadcast control (sources: Bleeding Cool, IMDb News).

Industry implications

Analysts say the standoff underscores broader tensions in U.S. broadcasting: large station groups can exert local editorial power by choosing whether to air national shows in their markets. The episode also accelerates the shift to streaming, reducing the leverage networks historically had via universal linear distribution and changing dynamics for advertising, affiliate relations, and content control (sources: That Park Place, IMDb News).

Questions about precedent and regulation

If major station groups routinely preempt national shows over content concerns, networks may face pressure to negotiate content standards or risk fragmenting national programming. Regulators, including the FCC, were drawn into the discussion; FCC Chair Brendan Carr issued warnings that added a regulatory tone, though the legal grounds for intervention remain limited and complex (source: Barrett Media).

Implications for California

Economic impact

  • Advertising and revenue: Late-night national advertisers may lose linear reach if preemptions persist, while local stations can sell the slot to regional advertisers — potentially benefiting small and mid-size California businesses.
  • Streaming and cord-cutting: Availability on Disney streaming platforms reduces immediate viewing pressure but widens the revenue gap between network ad sales and subscription models.

Political consequences

  • Expanded evening news slots create more opportunities for regional officials and candidates to garner late-night coverage.
  • The move may intensify debates about media bias and local control among politically moderate-conservative voters in some California markets.

Social effects

  • Local replacement programming may better reflect diverse community standards and sensitivities across California markets.
  • Households without streaming will miss nationally broadcast late-night conversation, shifting discourse toward local outlets and social media clips.

Cultural relevance

Preempting a nationally known show interrupts a shared cultural touchpoint in major California markets — Los Angeles, the Bay Area, Sacramento — and may encourage more locally produced content that aligns with regional values and issues.

Practical applications for Californians

  • How to watch: Check your local ABC affiliate schedule if you normally watch Jimmy Kimmel Live! on linear TV; the show may be available via Disney streaming for subscribers.
  • Local news access: Expect more late-night local news, investigative reports, or town-hall programming in affected markets.
  • Civic engagement: Without streaming, viewers may rely on social clips or secondary outlets for national late-night highlights.

Reporting notes and sources

This article is based on public statements and reporting from multiple trade and news outlets documenting station group decisions and network responses. Sources:

Preserved original facts, information, and source URLs as provided.

Share

Topics

Joel Patterson

Joel Patterson is a senior business and finance analyst for Times Media Service, based in the Washington bureau. Patterson covers markets, companies, personal finance and economic policy, along with transportation and its financial and economic impacts. Patterson holds a master's degree in finance and grew up in Newcastle upon Tyne, England.

Write to Joel